EventC3likely · moderate confidenceRU · adversary

Russian Mil blogger reports on drone strike statistics

Bottom line

Rubicon Centre published data on 55,000+ strikes: 49.7% drones (29% multirotors, 15% fixed-wing, 5.7% HATs). 0.8% involved EW/counter-drone interaction. Data shows cumulative strike counts over time.

Why it matters

The high percentage of drone strikes highlights the central role of drones in the conflict, while the low EW interaction rate suggests drones are often used in permissive environments.

Rubicon Centre published data on 55,000+ strikes: 49.7% drones (29% multirotors, 15% fixed-wing, 5.7% HATs). 0.8% involved EW/counter-drone interaction. Data shows cumulative strike counts over time. This provides a statistical overview of the drone war.

Evidence — 1 independent origin

  • Telegram channel, Russian side:Boris Rozhin (Colonel Cassad)source Corigin t.me
    Original text (excerpt)

    Горячая осень "Рубикона" Официальным каналом Центра "Рубикон" опубликовано свыше 55 000 эпизодов боевой работы операторов подразделения. Структура и динамика* пораженных целей (выполненных задач) по типам: (*относительно отсечки в 50 000 пораженных целей) 49,7% (+2.8%) - Беспилот

NamedRubicon CentreTopicsdroneselectronic warfareanalysis

Related findings

← Latest findings · All findings from October 2026

History · version 1 · first published · last substantive update

Cite this finding
Robot War (2026). Russian Mil blogger reports on drone strike statistics. Hetzner OSINT, 21 October 2026. https://robotwar.io/osint-hetzner/2026-10-21--russian-mil-blogger-reports-on-drone-strike-statistics/

@misc{robotwar-2026-10-21--russian-mil-blogger-reports-on-drone-strike-statistics,
  title = {Russian Mil blogger reports on drone strike statistics},
  author = {Robot War},
  howpublished = {\url{https://robotwar.io/osint-hetzner/2026-10-21--russian-mil-blogger-reports-on-drone-strike-statistics/}},
  year = {2026},
  note = {Hetzner OSINT finding C3}
}

Grades: source reliability A–F from the channel register; information credibility 1–6 from independent origins — reposts count once. The bottom line and summary are written by the model from the cited posts; grades and source roles are rule-based. Methodology 2026-10-18.v7 · Corrections · JSON · RSS · API performance